facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
Why Was the VIX “Only” 30 on April 3? A Study in Volatility Underreaction and Asymmetric Risk Signals Thumbnail

Why Was the VIX “Only” 30 on April 3? A Study in Volatility Underreaction and Asymmetric Risk Signals

Everyone is wondering why the Cboe Volatility Index (VIX) seems muted. 

The S&P 500 dropped -4.8% on April 3, 2025—a sharp one-day decline that would normally trigger a much larger spike in volatility.

And yet, the VIX® only rose to 30.02.

That might sound high in isolation, but in historical context, it’s a muted volatility response.

According to S&P Dow Jones Indices, going back to 1990, the average VIX close on days when the S&P 500 fell between -4% and -6% was 46, with a median of 44. In many cases during the 2008–2009 financial crisis and the COVID crash in 2020, the VIX surged well above 50, 60—even 70.

But not this time.

What Makes April 3, 2025 Different?

Here’s what we know:

  • S&P 500 1-day return: -4.8%
  • VIX close: 30.02
  • S&P 500 level: 5,397

Compared to past events, this was one of the lowest VIX responses to a ~5% drop in the S&P 500. This may suggest that options traders expect the situation to stabilize quickly, or that volatility has been underpriced relative to realized risk.

Volatility Underreaction = Opportunity?

When volatility does not spike as expected in the face of equity drawdowns, it raises questions—and opportunities.

Here are a few observations:

  • Volatility underreaction: The options market may be complacent or signaling a belief that downside is transitory. This is a form of underreaction that often precedes volatility expansion.
  • Asymmetric risk insight: When VIX rises less than expected relative to equity losses, the cost of hedging or positioning long volatility may be favorable—especially if market stress lingers or escalates.
  • Convexity in VIX behavior: The VIX does not move linearly with S&P 500 declines. Its response is convex, meaning small changes in trader sentiment or dealer positioning can lead to exponential shifts in implied volatility.

Options Market Signals and Market Reflexivity

This muted VIX spike could also reflect the structural shifts in the options market:

  • Zero DTE and reflexivity: Short-dated options dominate volume and can dampen implied volatility at the index level due to dealer hedging mechanics.
  • Systematic vol selling: Funds selling volatility across structured products, ETFs, or options overlays may have kept the VIX suppressed—until the feedback loop breaks.
  • Expectations of mean reversion: Traders may be anticipating a bounce, and positioning reflects a belief that this is a short-term shock, not a trend reversal.

What Asymmetric Investors Should Be Watching

For asymmetric traders, the key question isn’t “Why didn’t VIX go higher?” but:

Does this create a convex setup where volatility is cheap relative to the risk of further downside?

When the crowd underprices risk, that’s often where asymmetry is found.

  • Volatility may offer optionality: Buying volatility when it’s relatively cheap can create asymmetric payoffs, especially if downside accelerates.
  • Use options to structure defined risk trades: Low VIX can make it more attractive to buy puts or structure long-volatility spreads that cap downside while maintaining exponential upside.
  • Watch total portfolio risk exposure: A suppressed VIX doesn't mean risk is gone. It may simply be delayed.

The Bottom Line

The April 3 selloff offered a fascinating case of volatility underreaction. When the VIX doesn’t spike despite a sharp S&P 500 drawdown, it may be signaling complacency—or the calm before the storm.

For those of us who seek asymmetric opportunities, this kind of environment can offer optionality, convexity, and the chance to position for outsized upside relative to controlled downside.

When others are complacent, we get curious.